Arkansas Urges Entergy Breakup
PSC says state’s consumers bear unfair burden
Weekly Update Courtesy of Utility Regulatory News #3969: Pointing to long-standing problems with cost allocations among the various operating companies of the Entergy Corp., the Arkansas Public Service Commission has again exhorted Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (EAI) to spin itself off from its parent company and become a stand-alone entity.
The commission had first raised the prospect of such a move in February 2010, when it initiated an investigation into EAI’s possible withdrawal from the Entergy operating system. The commission indicated that it would like to see EAI serve as an individual utility and join either the Midwest ISO or the Southwest Power Pool. Although EAI’s president had offered assurances at a recent PSC hearing that EAI was seriously examining the option of restructuring as a stand-alone company, the commission noted that reports in the press and public statements from EAI appeared to show otherwise.
The commission expressed concern that maintaining the status quo places Arkansas ratepayers at a disadvantage because a disproportionate amount of common costs from Entergy’s systemwide operations are assigned to EAI. Citing figures showing that Arkansas ratepayers have subsidized Entergy customers in other states by more than $4.5 billion in the last 20 years, the commission asserted that a spin-off of EAI as a stand-alone entity would be the best way to assure that such improper cost allocations do not continue. For the full story, Subscribe to URN.
Posted: June 9th, 2010 under M&A, Uncategorized, finance, regulation, transmission regulation.
Comments: 1
Comments
Comment from charles e olson
Time: June 19, 2010, 5:58 pm
The Arkansas PSC should be careful here. In addition to losing certain scale benefits via spinoff there would be a huge fight, probably at FERC, regarding generation and transmission allocations and valuations. The PSC’s legal and consulting bill would be huge. All this fight amounts to is another way of the PSC saying they don’t like existing allocations. I don’t know if they are fair but I suspect the PSC approach won’t work to significantly reduce rate in Arkansas.
Write a comment