Fortnightly subscribers: access full report here

Not a subscriber yet? Sign up here for a free trial subscription, and we’ll provide access to the full report.

Sept. 1, 2009

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact:
Michael Burr
burr@pur.com
320-632-5342
Public Utilities Reports Inc.

Fortnightly 40 Survey: Utility Balance Sheets Strained by Growing Expenses, Declining Sales

 Cost pressures portend contentious rate cases.

Vienna, Va.: Share values among America’s utility, gas and power companies have outperformed the broader market since the financial crisis began one year ago. Maintaining this performance, however, might become more difficult in the months ahead, according to a report published in the September issue of Public Utilities Fortnightly magazine (www.fortnightly.com).

The fifth-annual Fortnightly 40 study, sponsored by Accenture, ranked the four-year shareholder value performance of U.S. investor-owned utilities (IOUs) and other companies active in electric power and gas industries. The C Three Group of Atlanta, which along with Public Utilities Fortnightly developed the F40 financial model, analyzed the annual reports of 85 companies to compare a series of shareholder-value metrics — such as profit margin, dividend yield, return on equity (ROE), return on assets (ROA) and sustainable growth.

Companies leading the F40 ranking this year included DPL, Energen and PPL. Ranked among the top 40 for the first time was NRG (32), and returning to the ranking after a year’s absence were Mirant (21) and AES (37) — three companies with heavy exposure in wholesale power markets. Conversely, Alliant and Northwest Natural Gas slipped to the bottom of the F40 after ranking in the high 20s last year.

The F40 metrics — combined with supplementary 2009 data — showed the industry remains financially robust despite a substantial decline in stock prices. Cap-ex spending among the Fortnightly 40 companies grew by nearly 30 percent in 2008, topping $49 billion, and the entire industry’s cap-ex increased 17 percent to nearly $94 billion. At the same time, equity returns among the top 40 companies declined only slightly, from 15.4 percent in FY2007 to 14.6 percent in 2008.

Notwithstanding these strong figures, economic forces are putting pressure on balance sheets. Kilowatt-hour deliveries have declined rapidly in many parts of the country — with residential consumption falling by as much as 8 percent in the second quarter of 2009, and industrial sales dropping at double-digit rates. These trends, combined with the costs of ongoing cap-ex programs, pushed the industry’s total net cash flow deeper into negative territory, from -$10.2 billion in FY2007 to -$19 billion in FY2008. Yet, despite this decline in free cash, utilities have continued growing their dividend payouts — albeit at a slower pace in the first half of 2009.

To protect dividends, companies are delaying spending projects and tightening operating budgets. “We’ve consolidated spending decisions among our plants,” said Paul Barbas, CEO of number-one ranked DPL Inc., parent of Dayton Power & Light in Ohio. “We have an engineering team for our entire business that stacks up investments on a fleet-wide basis.”

Additionally, some utilities have cut their payroll, and a few have been forced to slash dividends — a move applauded by rating agencies but abhorred by shareholders. The Fortnightly 40 study concludes that future financial performance — including the sector’s generous dividends — will depend as much on regulatory relationships as it does financial management.

“Utilities need regulators to make them whole for lost revenues, and also to finance the industry’s transition to a greener operating model,” said Michael T. Burr, Fortnightly’s editor-in-chief and the F40 study’s author. “The result will be rising rates — an unpopular move in any economy, and a political nightmare during a recession. Continued strong performance will depend on balancing customers’ need for clean and affordable energy supplies against utilities’ need for low-cost capital.”

The 2009 Fortnightly 40 Ranking
Copyright 2009, PUR Inc., Vienna, VA, All Rights Reserved. Permission to cite the F40 table in whole or in part is granted to publications that acknowledge the source as follows:

Public Utilities Fortnightly magazine, September 2009 (www.fortnightly.com). Sponsored by Accenture, with methodology and analysis provided by the C Three Group.

1  DPL
2  Energen
3  PPL
4  National Fuel Gas
5  Exelon
6  FirstEnergy
7  Entergy
8  New Jersey Resources
9  Southern Company
10  Questar
11* CLECO
11* Equitable Resources
13  Edison International
14* MDU Resources
14* TECO Energy
16  Dominion Resources
17  Public Service Enterprise Group
18* Allegheny Energy
18* Sempra Energy
20  AGL Resources
21  Mirant
22  Nicor
23  OGE Energy
24  UGI
25  NStar
26  South Jersey Industries
27  Delta Natural Gas
28  Centerpoint Energy
29* DTE Energy
29* PG&E
31  El Paso Electric
32* NRG
32* SCANA
34  WGL Holdings
35  MGE Energy
36  Vectren
37  AES
38  Northwest Natural Gas
39* Alliant
39* Ameren

* Indicates statistical tie among category ranks. Because the 39th position was a tie, the 2009 Fortnightly 40 contains no 40th rank.

PUBLIC UTILITIES FORTNIGHTLY (www.fortnightly.com), published by Public Utilities Reports Inc., in Vienna, Va., is the journal of record for the U.S. utility industry, providing authoritative, in-depth analysis of trends in generation, transmission and distribution of electricity and natural gas. For more than 70 years, Public Utilities Fortnightly has delivered exclusive interviews and expert analysis to help utility-industry executives and regulators decide where to invest, how the industry will be regulated and what the future holds. Subscription Rate: $169/year.

Posted: September 2nd, 2009 under Current News, Uncategorized, bear market, credit crunch, finance crisis, investment banks, recession, utility stocks.
Comments: none

-Mark T. Williams, Boston University Finance & Economics Department

For several decades, the top four U.S. independent investment banks—Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Lehman Brothers—have been instrumental to the growth of America’s power and gas utility industry. With the sudden shotgun marriage of Merrill Lynch, the bankruptcy of Lehman, and the transformation of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley into bank holding companies, the investment banks are now history.

Additionally, Wall Street investment banking has been consolidated rapidly with “the Big Three” commercial banks—Barclays PLC, Bank of America and J.P. Morgan—taking advantage of bottom-feeding opportunities.

This dramatic reshaping of Wall Street has come too swiftly to fully comprehend, yet it will have an immediate and lasting impact on the utility sector.

With immediate job losses among investment bankers, a decline in their ranks will reduce competition for underwriting utility bond deals. Less competition will equate to higher fees. This might not be immediately visible in a weak economy, but it will show up as the economy eventually rebounds.

Significant investment banking consolidation and downsizing will result in a loss of institutional knowledge as older experienced investment bankers are forced to take severances.

Having a banker who knows the history of the utility, and the company’s management and its level of corporate risk-taking, can be invaluable when structuring and underwriting bonds, as well as providing M&A guidance. Utilities will need to begin building new relationships.

The recent market crisis, including the bankruptcy of Lehman, has resulted in significant market uncertainty. The proposed $700 billion Treasury Department bailout has raised additional concerns about how such a plan will be funded. Such events have placed increased pressure on interest rates, raising the cost of both short-term and long-term capital. In addition, as more of the investment banking business falls in the hands of fewer commercial banks, it remains uncertain whether utilities can count on the same level of service they enjoyed previously. The corporate cultures of investment and commercial banking can be quite different, and Wall Street’s reshaping might result in customers losing out.

Prior to the weekend shotgun wedding with Merrill Lynch, Bank of America CEO Kenneth Lewis was less than enthusiastic about how investment banking activities might fit inside his institution. Moreover, it’s unclear whether these banks will view serving the gas and power utility industry as a strategic priority. For example, although Barclays is buying Lehman’s defunct investment bank, the European bank reportedly hasn’t decided which divisions it would keep and build a franchise around.

In the weeks and months ahead, one trend to watch closely is whether the investment bankers who are able to find new homes will be randomly scattered around Wall Street, or whether the Big Three banks will make it a priority to keep these utility teams intact.

Now that the Big Three hold more of the cards, they should reach out to the utility industry and pronounce their intentions. What will be their level of commitment? Will they devote the capital needed to adequately service this industry? We might be in a recession, but the market will recover eventually, and the utility industry will continue to grow and prosper. Having a knowledgeable investment banker ready, able and willing to underwrite or structure a merger will be crucial.

So the message to Barclays, Bank of America and the other institutions that may be the future home to our power and utility industry investment bankers: Whatever you do, be good to them, as they are an endangered species, and vital to this industry’s future.

Editor’s note: Williams previously was a senior vice president of Citizens Power LLC, a Boston based energy trading company, and a vice president with Edison Mission Energy. Prior to that worked at the Federal Reserve Bank as a full examiner.

Posted: September 24th, 2008 under Uncategorized, bear market, credit crunch, finance crisis, investment banks, recession, subprime lending.
Comments: none